A Favourable Holiday

By Niall Lennon

Undeniably one of the world’s most bizarre national holiday’s, Guy Fawkes Day, the thwarted attempt of a terrorist to bring down the British Government and monarch simultaneously, has remained a long-standing tradition for over four centuries. The catchy rhyme of recollection urges us to ‘remember remember the 5th of November’, but should we?

This evening across Great Britain men, women and children will gaze in delightful awe at the luminous and colourful explosions of  pyrotechnics displays, admire the crackling lights of sparklers waving in the cold Autumnal night and watch as the effigy of a man burns to sunder upon a roaring fire. In closer inspection, the oddity that is GFD becomes increasingly more bizarre when the fundamental point of the occasion is considered, the celebration of the unfulfilled plans of a would be mass murderer.

Granted it’s a morbid notion but it does have feasible significance and a plausible basis in history, unlike some other strange national holidays. Dogs in politics day, yes it exists, is celebrated in the United States of America each September 23rd. Its birth originates in a speech given by Richard Nixon in 1952, Vice Presidential candidate at this point, to address speculation that he may have used an $18,000 campaign contribution for personal use. In said speech, he admitted that his daughters had received a dog, which they named “Checkers”, as a gift. Granted, the occasion is not celebrated by a great number of Americans, but celebrated nonetheless.

Anyway, back to GFD. Just as a brief recap, a word to the unwise, the story to our own odd occasion goes as such. Guy Fawkes, a sixteenth century, York born, catholic convert placed barrels of gunpowder beneath the Houses of Parliament with the intent to blow up all in attendance at the opening of protestant King James I’s second parliament in 1605. The plot was foiled, Fawkes was captured, tried and sentenced to death for his plans of regicide. At his execution however, he managed to avoid the excruciating experience of being hanged, drawn and quartered by leaping from the gallows and breaking his own neck. Hurrah!

A grim tale indeed. Fawkes’ failure proved to be an unintended and inadvertent genius monarchal popularity enhancer for the generally loathed Scottish King. Immediately post attempt, an act of parliament was passed then designating the 5th of November as a day of celebration which would commemorate the narrow escape of the government and sovereign of a nation from total obliteration, remaining law until 1859. The day subsequently became a time to celebrate the fact that the catholic minority failed in reinstating a papally controlled King or Queen.

Four hundred years has of course altered the general tone of the occasion and the religious aspect is much less considered than in its origins. But GFD also has an alternative meaning to many people in Great Britain, who on this day rejoice in, if only in playful jest, the day that a catholic man nearly brought protestant England to its knees. Of course this attitude is generally more present in areas other than England

Although the 5th of November is deeply shrouded in morbidity, whatever it means to you, GFD is probably one of the least commercial national holidays we celebrate. No-one, to my knowledge, exchanges execution eggs, catholic creams or terrorist treats. No Guy Fawkes gifts at all. Christmas is now a multi billion pound industry in which the true spirit of the season has been commandeered by the monetary. Even Easter Egg sales made over and above £2bn in the UK earlier this year. So if GFD doesn’t really have that commercial aspect to it shouldn’t we seize the opportunity to enjoy a cheaper holiday?

As with everything else, hidden costs do exist for GFD. Firework displays, for example, are expensive to stage. Last year in York, the birth place of Mr. Fawkes, the local authority decided, for the fourth year running, not to hold a public display because of the expense involved. A York City Council spokesperson at the time said that a previous public consultation had asked people of the city whether a large pyrotechnics event would be good value for money, considering the cost would be in the region of £70,000. The consultation found that the public believed that the money would be better spent elsewhere. So given the opportunity people would rather not spend money on GFD and understandably so when taking into account the expenditure of the year’s other festivities.

Given the close proximity to Christmas, the likelihood that the public should ever allow GFD to become another sales orientated affair is quite unimaginable. In fairness, the costs that are involved, such as a firework display, do not come directly from public pockets meaning that GFD is a cost-effective, non-financially motivated and easily accessible occasion, a day that belongs to the people and not to the world of retail, which has to be an altogether infinitely more favourable holiday.

Major Banks Threaten to Leave the UK Over Financial Sector Shake Up

HSBC are one of the banks who have threatened to leave the UK

A Government inquiry is to examine whether retail and investment banking should be separated. The suggestion of which has prompted large financial institutions, such as HSBC,  to threaten to leave the UK.

The proposed reforms are just one of many major changes the Independent Commission on Banking are considering in a bid to reduce ‘market concentration’. What this means for the public is that High Street monopolies such as Lloyds will be most vulnerable.

Many of those within the financial sector feel that this move is a government reaction to the  public outcry over bank’s conduct leading up to the financial crisis, a key concern expressed by the electorate during the general election.

Stephen Hester, CEO the Royal Bank of Scotland, told the BBC that he believes that the concerns over banking monopolies was a ‘red herring’.

“In the financial crisis that we had, if you were a narrow bank, you were much more likely to go bust and if you were a small bank, you were much more likely to go bust – so these issues were not at the heart of the crisis,” he said.

Andrew Tyrie, the Conservative chairman of the Commons Treasury Committee, is determined that the review will be clear and precise. Speaking on BBC Radio 4′s Today programme Mr. Tyrie said that the ICB ’have got to be tough and resilient’.

“They’ve got to make sure that they don’t just become a prey to this very powerful interest group that we have in the country, which is the banks, and end up just reporting that we can muddle through.”

Pubs Get Rid of the Glass, a Senior Violence Researcher Pleads

The pint glass could soon be replaced by a plastic alternative.

Has the time come to ban the bottle? Alcohol related attacks involving glass in the UK are currently costing taxpayers £100m a year in reactionary services. A senior violence researcher is now urging the abolition of glass in pubs and clubs, however, the idea may not be very popular with licensees.

Dr. Alasdair Forsyth, of Glasgow Caledonian University and Glasgow Centre for the Study of Violence, is calling on alcohol retailers to consider exchanging glass drinks containers for a safer plastic option, in line with many pubs and clubs existing practices.

He points out that soft drinks are already sold in plastic bottles, milk in cartons, but that alcohol, which is the main driving force behind these attacks, is still purchased in a container which can easily double as a potentially lethal weapon.

An alternative polycarbonate glass was introduced in pubs across the city of Hull two years ago, which resulted in an estimated saving of  around £7m for the NHS alone.

Mark Hastings of the Beer and Pub association, in an interview with Sky News, said that plans to ban glass in all licensed premises was disproportionate and that it should not be enforced all of the time:

“Glasses are only one of the things that people could pick up and use as a weapon should they choose to do it. There are chairs, tables, knives and forks. Where do we stop with this effort to drive out anything that could cause harm to people?”

The research carried out by Dr. Forsyth showed that resistance to using plastic containers could also come from the public. His study showed that resistance to plastic containers was much lower in younger people than those aged 40 plus, as they quite often believe that glass keeps the drink cooler.

Blake Golding, a doorman in Milton Keynes, was attacked with a bottle resulting in 50 stitches and knows only too well the damage a glass container can do when  in the hands of the wrong person. His mother is now campaigning to ban glass from pubs and clubs after witnessing first hand the traumatic affect the attack has had on her sons life.

Dr. Forsyth will tell the The World Safety Conference today that evidence suggests that after knives, glass and bottles are the most commonly used weapon.

World’s second largest wind farm given green light

wind-farm

Niall Lennon

The Government gave NPower the go ahead today to build a giant wind farm off the coast of Wales, making the offshore development one of the largest of its kind.

Npower, who will be leading the development, have proposed to build between 150 and 250 turbines eight miles off the North Wales coast. It will be close the site of two other wind farms currently in the vicinity, which are just off the coast of the resort Rhyl. Once completed, the new development will be capable of generating power for more than half a million homes.

The new Gwynt y Mor wind farm will be the second largest in the world, the largest also being a UK development, the North Hoyle wind farm off the North Wales coast. The Gwynt y Mor development will start power production in 2012, subject to consent from onshore electricity works.

Paul Cowling, managing director of Npower renewables, welcomed Government approval for the scheme. “This is an important step towards realising this ambitious project. The decision underlines the Government’s commitment to massively expanding renewable energy generation in the UK to help tackle climate change and improve security of energy supply,” he said.

The Government’s approval of this new development is another step towards achieving their 2020 renewable energy targets and will also solidify the UK’s position as the leading nation in offshore wind energy production. Energy and Climate Change Secretary Ed Milliband said: “The North Wales coast is set to become a powerhouse for renewable energy,

“Gwynt y Mor will be the largest of four offshore wind farms which combined will have the potential to power the equivalent of around 680,000 homes with green electricity. The UK must clean up its energy supply to fight the damaging effects of climate change and more wind power will help us do this, we are leading the world in offshore wind.”

Also sharing Mr Milliband’s enthusiasm, a spokesman for the British Wind Energy Association said, “This is fantastic news. Gwynt y Mor is a landmark project both for Wales and the United Kingdom as a whole. It brings the total offshore projects with planning approval to 4.5GW. The momentum is now behind wind as a viable source of sustainable energy.”

Although the proposed development has achieved much support, some local politicians have been angered. Also many local people believe that they were not properly consulted before the project was allowed. Objectors to the wind farm also say that the sight of the turbines will ruin the views from the shore and could potentially damage tourism in the area.

The Plaid Cymru AM for Aberconwy, Gareth Jones, said: “This extraordinary decision by the Westminster Labour Government in London flies in the face of the democratically-expressed wishes of the people of Wales, who have been wholly ignored by a London minister who, I dare say, has not even been here to witness the visual impact for himself.”

 An Assembly Government spokesman responded to the allegations that locals were not consulted stating, “The Welsh Assembly Government did request a public inquiry into the Gwynt y Mor proposal on the grounds of its visual impact, especially in combination with the other three smaller offshore wind farms off the North Wales coast and taking into account Llandudno’s historic built environment.”

“Although our viewpoint was made clear – that the above issues should be tested via a public inquiry before ministers took their decision – those ministers are entirely within their rights to override our request and to arrive at a decision on the information before them. Now that the decision is made, Welsh companies should seek to capitalise on the opportunities that will arise from this huge project,” he added.

Local Authorities will be required by law to rescue failing schools

Ed Balls, Secretary of Schools

Ed Balls, Secretary of Schools

Niall Lennon

Proposals in the Queen’s speech today confirmed that local authorities will be required by law to rescue poor performing schools and intervene before standards reach critical levels.

This legislation has been widely anticipated prompted by an announcement by Schools Secretary Ed Balls back in June. Ed Balls declared that unless 638 low achieving schools improved their exam results they would either face closure or be turned into academies.

The responsibility to overlook the raising in school standards was then handed to local authorities. Ed Balls plan came as part of a £400m initiative to raise exam results after statistics revealed that fewer than 30% of pupils scored five Cs in their GCSEs.

The Schools Secretary said: “This Bill underlines our commitment to revolutionising the education system so that it delivers for all young people, whatever their interests or abilities. Local authorities will play a key role in making this happen as they are best placed to respond to the needs of young people locally.”

“These reforms will mean that delivery of learning and skills provision and other support to children and their families is locally owned, locally integrated and also accountable and responsive to individuals’ needs and choices. I am confident the new streamlined Young People’s Learning Agency will support local authorities as they make these reforms a reality.”

The Queen also confirmed other plans to reform the school system. England and Wales’ high achieving schools will face less Ofsted (the Office for Standards in Education, Children’s Services and Skills) inspections, allowing them to continue in their efforts without close scrutiny.

Ofqual will become the new exams regulator for maintaining standards and regulating the qualifications market, taking over from the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA). The Learning and Skills Council (LSC) is also to be replaced by the Young People’s Learning Agency, which will support local authorities to carry out their responsibilities for 16-19 year olds.

Not every one agrees however with the new proposals. Christine Blower, acting general secretary of the National Union of Teachers (NUT), said: “Promoting excellence in all schools is an aim we fully endorse. Who wouldn’t? However, this will not be achieved by the draconian measures that are taken to tackle schools that fall short of inconsistent standards the Government decides makes a failing school.”

Also skeptical about the changes Liberal Democrat children’s spokesman David Laws described the bill as a ‘missed opportunity’. “This Bill is a hotch-potch of disconnected proposals thrown together to create an impression of momentum and direction which simply doesn’t exist” he remarked.

Lufthansa to take over BMI

It was announced today that German company Lufthansa will buy 50% of BMI’s shares giving it a 80% control of the British airline combined with the stake in the company it previously owned.

This take over will now make Lufthansa the second largest airline running flights from London’s Heathrow Airport, second only to British Airways, which should prove some competition to the flagship airline, however the deal will have to be overseen by trading standards in line with EU business competition regulations. The deal is expected to be completed mid January but Lufthansa have not announced the bid price.

There has been much speculation that Lufthansa will join forces with Virgin on long and short haul flights to dominate Heathrow Airport, providing some stiff competition for British Airways, who have recently teamed up with American Airlines. Lufthansa have not yet released any statements however regarding the takeover and their intentions for BMI’s future.

This is the second large investment in rival airlines Lufthansa has engaged in this year. Last month Lufthansa bought a 45% share of Brussels Airlines parent company SN Air-holding for e65m with the option to buy the remaining shares between now and 2011. Although the company has had two large investments this year it reported a 75% drop in profits this summer. Its profits in the last nine months is reported to be e984m.

BMI’s Chairman Sir Michael Bishop, who owns the 50% BMI shares Lufthansa is making a bid for, is believed to have forced the sale under a long standing agreement with the German airline that was originally signed back in 1999 which stated that if he ever chose to sell his shares Lufthansa would make the purchase. There is also speculation that other areas of BMI’s business could be sold off although no job cuts will be made.

BMI operates 54 aircraft, flying to 209 destinations and currently controls 11% of take-off slots at Heathrow Airport. Despite this net profits fell last year from £29.7m to £15.5m. Passenger numbers did rise however by 1% in the last year. This drop in profits was written by Lufthansa as part of a previously agreed partnership.

Obama’s Airwave Invasion

Obama's campaign will run advertisements for half an hour on three major networks

Obama

By Niall Lennon

Barack Obama is set to dominate American television tonight by running a 30 minute political advert on three of the nations main networks.

The adverts, which will be shown at 20:00 eastern time, is said to be costing the Obama campaign in the region of $6m, making the adverts the most expensive piece of political advertising in the history of the United States. This once again has brought the Obama team under the spotlight and seems to be giving more weight to the argument that he has dominated the US media throughout this election process.

Senator Obama’s Campaign is believed to have raised the unprecedented amount of about $660m since he started his bid for president, double the amount Senator McCain’s team have raised. Most of Obama’s television campaigns up until this point have focused on local television in predominantly Republican areas, such as the east coast states of North Carolina, Virginia and Florida.

$150m of Obama’s campaign funds are said to have been spent in local TV markets and $30m on national ads on network and cable TV. It is also believed by the end of October he will have spent $100m on television campaigns for this month alone. Quite a significant amount compared to the $13m Senator McCain’s team have spent on television campaigning throughout the whole process.

This political television advertising format was also used back in 1992 when independent candidate Ross Perot ran a series of advertisements running for a half hour at a time. This style of campaigning was abandoned however, largely due to the shear cost of the adverts, but also because political commentators believed that this format would not hold the attention of American public for the full broadcast.

Obama’s half hour advertisements will be focusing on the two key domestic issues that seem to have been the main topics of debate during this final leg of the presidential battle, energy and taxes. Obama’s manifesto states that he wants to invest in alternative fuels and redistribute America’s wealth, promising tax cuts for households earning less than $250,000 per year, his main pledge on the matter being ‘I want to raise up the middle classes’.

Criticism has also been received on both sides throughout the presidential race due to the underhanded nature of some of the advertisements put out there by both sides to deliberately tarnish the name of their opponents raising questions of ethics. McCain’s team outweighed the Democrats however in the smear campaign, with 47% of their advertisements seen to be negative compared to 35% of obama’s adverts seen to be damning of McCain.

Saxual Harassment

It’s never too late to learn something new I always say, so after a discussion with a colleague last month I came to the realisation, in a penny dropping, nirvana achieving style moment, I would love to learn to play the Saxophone. The one thing I never considered however was the noise.

Over the years I’ve learned to play the Piano, a bit, and the Guitar, sort of, so I said ‘third time lucky, this’ll be the one that I can really dedicate myself to’. So I started researching my next venture. I read up on the history, watched videos on YouTube, compared prices, read the pro jazz-anti classical forums and the pro classical-anti Jazz forums, oh yes, it’s as fearsome as Celtic and Rangers.

And then the day came, I found it, reasonably priced, lots of accompanying paraphernalia and even a ‘play with me’ DVD. So I dashed home, assembled the body, put in the reed, tightened the screws, attached the strap and then it happened. As I blew into it, it produced a sound so loud that I could only compare it to the starting grid at Silverstone. It shook my being to its very core.

I knew it was invented by Adolphe Sax in 1841. I knew it came in Alto, Baritone, Bass, and Tenor. I knew Charlie Parker is considered by many to be the greatest Saxophonist of all time. However the most important fact, which I knew nothing about, nor had I even contemplated, was that it would produce a sound so loud it could probably be considered worthy of an Anti Social Behaviour Order.

As a considerate neighbour with a ‘do unto others’ type mantra, I realised there is no way on earth I’m going to be able to play this in my flat, but more importantly, I don’t want to be hauled up in front of a judge for simply trying to culturally better myself or to even just increase my levels of ability. So I then asked the question, could my Sax and I actually get an ASBO?

I asked a City of Edinburgh Council insider within the ASBO division, ‘so, what are my chances’? ”We have had to place orders on people for a number of reasons. In terms of instances when it was due to noise, it is generally because of complaints we have received regarding loud music being played between the hours of 11pm and 7am. I can’t recall us having to put an order on someone for playing an instrument though” he replied.

Great, I’m off the hook I thought, but he then added, “Our work is generally about enforcing curfews but the general rule with music is that it must be below 41 decibels. I do know in Leeds they had to ban a woman from playing Dolly Parton songs after she tormented her neighbours by playing them on a loop for months, so the orders can be tailor made if need be.”

The acronym itself immediately conjures up notions of Vicky Pollard, Kappa tracksuits and Burberry baseball caps but potentially, anyone could have this four lettered ban slapped upon them. Bagpipers in Edinburgh’s Old Town were told by police in June of this year that if they persisted in playing in the city’s Castlehill and Lawnmarket areas that they would find themselves being given the dreaded ASBO.

Police said that they had no choice but to take the action after receiving up to 20 complaints a day over the period of a year by members of the public. And that regardless of whether the musicians were a tourist attraction or that one might even expect to see and hear them around the capital, the police considered the pipers to be unlicensed buskers.

A Scottish Government report in 2007 exploring the use of the ASBO in Scotland stated that there were 344 ASBO applications submitted to the courts in 2005/06 and that most of the cases considered for ASBO applications were triggered by ‘excess noise’ within the home. Perpetrators were usually found to be male, over the age of 21 and living in the social rented sector.

The report also noted that very few ASBOs had been taken out against youths, contrary to public perception, however appreciable numbers of cases were being reviewed. A case file review found that a number of the cases were long running, demonstrating that ASBOs were being used as a ‘last resort’ measure for difficult cases.

Ok, so I’m probably not going to achieve an ASBO overnight but I don’t think I’ll be taking the risk, just in case. So I think the plan now is to find a tutor with hearing impaired neighbours or someone who gives lessons on a secluded mountain top, a la Maria Von Trapp, and confine my playing to their presence. I think I’ll start by checking the classified listings under services offered, wish me luck.

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 21 other followers

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.